meganbmoore: (wbds: ji/gwang taek: fightsex)
Wendell is one of the cofounders of SmartBitchesTrashyBooks.com and one of the authors of Beyond Heaving Bosoms.


Note: The looks you get for reading non-fiction about romance novels in public is even better than the ones you get for reading romance novels with trashy covers in public.


Unlike Beyond Heaving Bosom (which, while not perfect, analyzes the history, subgenres, merits and demerits of the genre) I can't help but think that Everything I Know About Love I Learned From Romance Novels isn't written so much for people who read and enjoy romance novels without a lick of self-consciousness or need to depreciate in their reading and enjoyment as much as it's meant to be thrown at the heads of people who are judgey of romance novels or like to talk about how they're just for the sex scenes and/or so terribly unrealistic (unlike thrillers and mysteries and SFF and games and men's adventure novels and...) and BAD FOR YOUR BRAIN OMG WOMEN DON'T YOU REALIZE YOU'RE RUINING YOURSELVES FOR REAL MEN? I also found it to be a bit on the defensive side, but given the way romance novels and the people who read and write them are viewed by most, I don't think I can really blame the book on that.


Everything I Know About Love I Learned From Romance Novels is basically a collection and analysis of testimonials from both romance authors and readers about what in real life goes into the books (authors) and what romance novels have made them realize/learn (both). It's basically a defense of romance novels as a valid form of literature and I think it works well as such, but I suspect that most who read it aren't actually the ones who will need to be convinced of that.
meganbmoore: (next stop: amnesia)

We do it in the dark. Under the sheets. With a penlight. We wear sunglasses and a baseball hat at the bookstore. We have a "special place" where we store them. Let's face it: Not many folks are willing to publicly admit they love romance novels. Meanwhile, romance continues to be the bestselling fiction genre. Ever. So what's with all the shame?

A while back, Tan and Wendell’s website Smart Bitches, Trashy Books got a lot of attention when they discovered that prolific romance novelist Cassie Edwards had plagiarized various texts in order to add “historical flavor” to her books. Such as a post-coital discussion about black-footed ferrets ripped from an academic article. Now they’ve published a 300 (or so) page meta about romance novels.

The book is brilliantly funny and sometimes so spot on that it’s painful to read. Such as the 49 page “choose your own romance novel” section, which allows you to explore the most stereotyped archetypes of the romance novel in its various manifestations. This is followed by a romance novel coloring page and romance novel mad libs. Never let it be said that art projects and games have no place in semi-serious discussion?

Tan and Wendell deconstruct and examine the genre and its characters and manifestations on all levels, including its strengths and weaknesses, as well as the genre’s politicas and representations of society, race, gender and sexuality. And do it all in a typically brilliantly and bitingly funny way. A few quotes:

cut for length )

It’s not perfect-for example, the writers are clearly used to a format where they can later return and expand on their thoughts after receiving feedback, something they address themselves at the end, and I’m not sure I agree with some of their assertions, such as that it’s the hero’s job, not the heroine’s, to hold the reader’s interest-but it’s a good read for people who like the genre, either unabashedly or shamefully, and for people who wonder why it’s so popular, or why people they think of as smart read the things.

Profile

meganbmoore: (Default)
meganbmoore

July 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26 2728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 12:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »